Basel Norms in India

B. C. D. E. F. G. Background Functions of Basel Committee The Evolution to Basel II – First Basel Accord Capital Requirements and Capital Calculation under Basel I Criticisms of Basel I New Approach to Risk Based Capital Structure of Basel II First Pillar : Minimum Capital Requirement Types of Risks under Pillar I The Second Pillar : Supervisory Review Process The Third Pillar : Market Discipline 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 II. The Three Pillar Approach A. B. C. D. 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 III. Capital Arbitrage and Core Effect of Basel II A. Capital Arbitrage B. Bank Loan Rating under Basel II Capital Adequacy Framework C. Effect of Basel II on Bank Loan Rating IV. Basel II in India A. Implementation C. Impact on Indian Banks D. Impact on Various Elements of Investment Portfolio of Banks E. Impact on Bad Debts and NPA’s of Indian Banks D. Government Policy on Foreign Investment E. Threat of Foreign Takeover 8 8 9 10 10 10 V. Conclusion A. SWOT Analysis of Basel II in Indian Banking Context B. Challenges going ahead under Basel II 11 11 13 13 VI. VII. References The Technical Paper Presentation Team 2 I. Introduction: A. Background Basel II is a new capital adequacy framework applicable to Scheduled Commercial Banks in India as mandated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The Basel II guidelines were issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that was initially published in June 2004. The Accord has been accepted by over 100 countries including India. In April 2007, RBI published the final guidelines for Banks operating in India. Basel II aims to create international standards that deals with Capital Measurement and Capital Standards for Banks which banking regulators can use when creating regulations about how much banks need to put aside to guard against the types of financial and operational risks banks face. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision was constituted by the Central Bank Governors of the G-10 countries in 1974 consisting of members from Australia, Brazil, Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Spain, India, Japan, etc to name a few. The ommittee regularly meets four times a year at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland where its 10 member Secretariat is located. B. Functions of the Basel Committee The purpose of the committee is to encourage the convergence toward common approaches and standards. However, the Basel Committee is not a classical multilateral organisation like World Trade Organisation. It has no founding treaty and it does not issue binding regulat ions. It is rather an informal forum to find policy solutions and promulgate standards. C. The Evolution to Basel II – First Basel Accord The First Basel Accord (Basel I) was completed in 1988. The main features of Basel I were: †¢ †¢ †¢ Set minimum capital standards for banks Standards focused on credit risk, the main risk incurred by banks Became effective end-year 1992 The First Basel Accord aimed at creating a level playing field for internationally active banks. Hence, banks from different countries competing for the same loans would have to set aside roughly the same amount of capital on the loans. D. Capital Requirements and Capital Calculation under Basel – I Minimum Capital Adequacy ratio was set at 8% and was adjusted by a loan’s credit risk weight. Credit risk was divided into 5 categories viz. 0%, 10%, 20%, 50% and 100%. Commercial loans, for example, were assigned to the 100% risk weight category. To calculate required capital, a bank would multiply the assets in each risk category by the category’s risk weight and then multiply the result by 8%. Thus, a Rs 100 commercial loan would be multiplied by 100% and then by 8%, resulting in a capital requirement of Rs8. E. Criticisms of Basel – I Following are the criticisms of the First Basel Accord (Basel I):†¢ †¢ It took too simplistic an approach to setting credit risk weights and for ignoring other types of risk. Risks weights were based on what the parties to the Accord negotiated rather than on the actual risk of each asset. Risk weights did not flow from any particular insolvency probability standard, and were for the most part, arbitrary. 3 †¢ †¢ †¢ The requirements did not account for the operational and other forms of risk that may also be important. Except for trading account activities, the capital standards did not account for hedging, diversification, and differences in risk management techniques. Advances in technology and finance allowed banks to develop their own capital allocation models in the 1990’s. This resulted in more accurate calculation of bank capital than possible under Basel I. These models allowed banks to align the amount of risk they undertook on a loan with the overall goals of the bank. Internal models allow banks to more finely differentiate risks of individual loans than is possible under Basel – I. It facilitates risks to be differentiated within loan categories and between loan categories and also allows the application of a capital charge to each loan, rather than each category of loan. F. New Approach to Risk-Based Capital †¢ †¢ †¢ By the late 1990’s, growth in the use of regulatory capital arbitrage led the Basel Committee to begin work on a new capital regime (Basel II) Effort focused on using banks’ internal rating models and internal risk models June 1999: The Basel Committee issued a proposal for a new capital adequacy framework to replace Basel – I. In order to overcome the criticisms of Basel – I and for adoption of the new approach to riskbased capital, Basel II guidelines were introduced. G. Structure of Basel – II Basel – II adopts a three pillar approach: †¢ †¢ †¢ Pillar I – Minimum Capital Requirement (Addressing Credit Risk, Operational Risk Market Risk) Pillar II – Supervisory Review (Provides Framework for Systematic Risk, Liquidity Risk Legal Risk) Pillar III – Market Discipline Disclosure (To promote greater stability in the financial system) II. The Three Pillar Approach The first pillar establishes a way to quantify the minimum capital requirements. The main objective of Pillar I is to align capital the adequacy ratios to the risk sensitivity of the assets affording a greater flexibility in the computation of banks’ individual risk. Capital Adequacy Ratio is defined as the amount of regulatory capital to be maintained by a bank to account for various risks inbuilt in the banking system. The focus of Capital Adequacy Ratio under Basel I norms was on credit risk and was calculated as follows: Capital Adequacy Ratio = Tier I Capital+Tier II Capital Risk Weighted Assets Basel Committee has revised the guidelines in the year June 2001 known as Basel II Norms. Capital Adequacy Ratio in New Accord of Basel II: Capital Adequacy Ratio = Total Capital (Tier I Capital+Tier II Capital) Market Risk(RWA) + Credit Risk(RWA) + Operation Risk(RWA) *RWA = Risk Weighted Assets Calculation of Capital Adequacy Ratio: Total Capital: Total Capital constitutes of Tier I Capital and Tier II Capital less shareholding in other banks. Tier I Capital = Ordinary Capital + Retained Earnings Share Premium – Intangible assets. Tier II Capital = Undisclosed Reserves + General Bad Debt Provision+ Revaluation Reserve+ Subordinate debt+ Redeemable Preference shares Tier III Capital: Tier III Capital includes subordinate debt with a maturity of at least 2 years. This is addition or substitution to the Tier II Capital to cover market risk alone. Tier III Capital should not cover more than 250% of Tier I capital allocated to market risk. A. First Pillar : Minimum Capital Requirement B. Types of Risks under Pillar I . Credit Risk Credit risk is the risk of loss due to a debtor’s non-payment of a loan or other line of credit (either the principal or interest (coupon) or both). Basel II envisages two different ways of measuring credit risk which are standarised approach, Internal Rating-Based Approach. The Standardised Approach The standardized approach is conceptually the same as the present Accord, but is more ri sk sensitive. Under this approach the banks are required to use ratings from External Credit Rating Agencies to quantify required capital for credit risk. The Internal Ratings Based Approach (IRB) Under the IRB approach, different methods will be provided for different types of loan exposures. Basically there are two methods for risk measurement which are Foundation IRB and Advanced IRB. The framework allows for both a foundation method in which a bank estimate the probability of default associated with each borrower, and the supervisors will 5 supply the other inputs and an advanced IRB approach, in which a bank will be permitted to supply other necessary inputs as well. Under both the foundation and advanced IRB approaches, the range of risk weights will be far more diverse than those in the standardized approach, resulting in greater risk sensitivity. 2. Operational Risk An operational risk is a risk arising from execution of a company’s business functions. As such, it is a very broad concept including e. g. fraud risk, legal risk, physical or environmental risks, etc. Basel II defines operational risk as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. Although the risks apply to any organization in business, this particular risk is of particular relevance to the banking regime where regulators are responsible for establishing safeguards to protect against systematic failure of the banking system and the economy. Banks will be able to choose between three ways of calculating the capital charge for operational risk – the Basic Indicator Approach, the Standardized Approach and the advanced measurement Approaches. 3. Market Risk Market risk is the risk that the value of a portfolio, either an nvestment portfolio or a trading portfolio, will decrease due to the change in value of the market risk factors. The four standard market risk factors are stock prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and commodity prices. The preferred approach is VAR(value at risk). C. The Second Pillar : Supervisory Review Process Supervisory review process has been introduced to ensure not only that banks have adequate capital to support all th e risks, but also to encourage them to develop and use better risk management techniques in monitoring and managing their risks. The process has four key principles – a) Banks should have a process for assessing their overall capital adequacy in relation to their risk profile and a strategy for monitoring their capital levels. b) Supervisors should review and evaluate bank’s internal capital adequacy assessment and strategies, as well as their ability to monitor and ensure their compliance with regulatory capital ratios. c) Supervisors should expect banks to operate above the minimum regulatory capital ratios and should have the ability to require banks to hold capital in excess of the minimum. ) Supervisors should seek to intervene at an early stage to prevent capital from falling below minimum level and should require rapid remedial action if capital is not mentioned or restored. D. The Third Pillar : Market Discipline Market discipline imposes strong incentives to banks to conduct their business in a safe, sound and effective manner. It is proposed to be effected through a series of disclosure requirements on capital, risk exposure etc. so that market participants can assess a bank’s capital adequacy. These disclosures should be made at least semiannually and more frequently if appropriate. Qualitative disclosures such as risk management objectives and policies, definitions etc. may be published annually. 6 III. Capital Arbitrage and Core Effect of Basel II Regulatory arbitrage is where a regulated institution takes advantage of the difference between its real (or economic) risk and the regulatory position. Securitization is the main means used by Banks to engage in Regulatory Capital Arbitrage. Example of Capital Arbitrage is given below: A. Capital Arbitrage †¢ Assume a bank has a portfolio of commercial loans with the following ratings and internally generated capital requirements – AA-A: 3%-4% capital needed – B+-B: 8% capital needed – B- and below: 12%-16% capital needed Under Basel I, the bank has to hold 8% risk-based capital against all of these loans To ensure the profitability of the better quality loans, the bank engages in capital arbitrage, it securitizes the loans so that they are reclassified into a lower regulatory risk category with a lower capital charge Lower quality loans with higher internal capital charges are kept on the bank’s books because they require less risk-based capital than the bank’s internal model indicates. †¢ †¢ †¢ B. Bank Loan Rating under Basel – II Capital Adequacy Framework †¢ On April 27, 2007, the Reserve Bank of India released the final guidelines for implementation of the New Capital Adequacy Framework (Basel II) applicable to the Banking system of the country The new framework mandates that the amount of capital provided by a bank against any loan and facility will be based on the credit rating assigned to the loan issue by an external rating agency. This means that a loan and a facility with a higher credit rating will attract a lower risk weight than one with a lower credit rating. †¢ †¢ Illustration of capital-saving potential by banks on a loan of Rs 1000 million Rating Basel I Basel II Capital Saved (Rs Long Short Risk Capital Risk Capital Million) Term Term Weight Required* Weight Required Rating Rating (Rs Million) (Rs Million) AAA P1+ 100% 90 20% 18 72 AA P1 100% 90 30% 27 63 A P2 100% 90 50% 45 45 BBB P3 100% 90 100% 90 0 BB P4 P5 100% 90 150% 135 (45) below Unrated Unrated 100% 90 100% 90 0 *Capital required is computed as Loan Amount ? Risk Weight ? 9% C. Effect of Basel – II on Bank Loan Rating †¢ †¢ Banks would either prefer that the Borrower should get itself rated, or, It would prefer that the borrowing institution should pay a higher rate of interest to compensate for the loss. 7 To substantiate the above fact, following example is taken in respect of a strong company: Loan of Rating AAA is taken of Rs 100 Crores @ 12% interest rate Capital Adequacy Rating Risk % Capital Required Opportunity Ratio (Rs Crores) Interest lost by the Bank (Rs Crores) C. A. R. Unrated 100% 9. 00 1. 08 C. A. R. New 20% 1. 80 0. 22 Total Opportunity Interest lost by the Bank (Rs Crores) 0. 86 Hence, Banks would resort to the above-mentioned measures in order to reduce or curb this loss on opportunity interest. Worse affected by this action taken by Banks would be the weaker companies. They would either be charged a higher rate of interest on loans to compensate for the loss or would alternatively have to approach another bank charging a lower rate of interest. The ideal solution to this problem would be that a weaker company should get itself rated and also take steps in order to have a better credit rating. Credit Rating is an evaluation of credit worthiness of a person, company or instrument. Thus, it indicates their willingness to pay for the obligation and the net worth. IV. Basel II in India A. Implementation The deadline for implementing the base approach of Basel II norms in India, was originally set for March 31, 2007. Later the RBI extended the deadline for Foreign banks in India and Indian banks operating abroad to meet those norms by March 31, 2008, while all other scheduled commercial banks were to adhere to the guidelines by March 31, 2009. Later the RBI confirmed that all commercial banks were Basel II compliant by March 31, 2009. Keeping in view the likely lead time that may be needed by the banks for creating the requisite technological and the risk management infrastructure, including the required databases, the MIS and the skill up-gradation, etc. , RBI has proposed the implementation of the advanced approaches under Basel II in a phased manner starting from April 1, 2010 B. Impact on Indian Banks Basel II allows national regulators to specify risk weights different from the internationally recommended ones for retail exposures. The RBI had, therefore, announced an indicative set of weights for domestic corporate long-term loans and 8 bonds subject to different ratings by international rating agencies such as Moody’s Investor Services which are slightly different from that specified by the Basel Committee (Table 1). C. Impact on various elements of the investment portfolio of banks The bonds and debentures portfolio of the banks consist of investments into higher rated companies, hence the corporate assets measured using the standardised approach may be exposed to slightly lower risk weights in comparison with the 100 per cent risk weights assigned under Basel I. The Indian banks have a large short-term portfolio in the form of cash credit, overdraft and working capital demand loans, which were un-rated, and carried a risk weight of 100 per cent under the Basel I regime. They also have short-term investments in commercial papers in their investment portfolio, which also carried a 100 per cent risk weight. The RBI’s capital adequacy guidelines has prescribed lower risk weights for short-tem exposures, if these are rated (Table 2). This provides the banks with an opportunity to benefit from their investments in commercial paper (which are typically rated in A1+/A1 category) and give them the potential to exploit the proposed short-term credit risk weights by obtaining short-term ratings for exposures in the form of cash credit, overdraft and working capital loans. The net result is that the implementation of Basel II provided Indian banks with the opportunity to significantly reduce their credit risk weights and reduce their required regulatory capital, if they suitably adjust their portfolio by lending to rated but strong corporate and increase their retail lending. According to some reports, most of the Indian banks who have migrated to Basel II have reported a reduction in their total Capital Adequacy Ratios (CARs). However, a few banks, those with high exposures to higher rated corporate or to the regulatory retail portfolio, have reported increased CARs. However, a recent study by New Delhi-based industry lobby group Assocham has concluded that Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) of a group of commercial banks, which were part of the study improved to 13. 48% in 2008-09 from 12. 35% in 2007-08, due to lower risk weights, implementation of Basel II norms and slower credit growth. 9 D. Bad debts and requirement of additional capital In this context, the situation regarding bad debts and NPA’s is very pertinent. The proportion of total NPAs to total advances declined from 23. 2 per cent in March 1993 to 7. per cent in March, 2004. The improvement in terms of NPAs has been largely the result of provisioning or infusion of capital. This meant that if the banks required more capital, as they would to implement Basel II norms, they would have to find capital outside of their own or the governmentâ₠¬â„¢s resources. ICRA has estimated that, Indian banks would need additional capital of up to Rs. 12,000 crore to meet the capital charge requirement for operational risk under Basel II. Most of this capital would be required by PSBs Rs. 9,000 crore, followed by the new generation private sector banks Rs. 1,100 crore, and the old generation private sector bank Rs. 750 crore. In practice, to deal with this, a large number of banks have been forced to turn to the capital market to meet their additional regulatory capital requirements. ICICI Bank, for example, has raised around Rs. 3,500 crore, thus improving its Tier I capital significantly. Many of the PSBs, namely, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India, Bank of Baroda and Dena Bank, besides private sector banks such as UTI Bank have either already tapped the market or have announced plans to raise equity capital in order to boost their Tier I capital. E. Government Policy on foreign investment The need to go public and raise capital challenged the government policy aimed at restricting concentration of share ownership, maintaining public dominance and limiting foreign influence in the banking sector. One immediate fallout was that PSBs being permitted to dilute the government’s stake to 51 per cent, and the pressure to reduce this to 33 per cent increased. Secondly, the government allowed private banks to expand equity by accessing capital from foreign investors. This put pressure on the RBI to rethink its policy on the ownership structure of domestic banks. In the past the RBI has emphasised the risks of concentrated foreign ownership of banking assets in India. Subsequent to a notification issued by the Government, which had raised the FDI limit in private sector banks to 74 per cent under the automatic route, a comprehensive set of policy guidelines on ownership of private banks was issued by the RBI. These guidelines stated, among other things, that no single entity or group of related entities would be allowed to hold shares or exercise control, directly or indirectly, in any private sector bank in excess of 10 per cent of its paid-up capital. F. Threat of foreign takeover There has been growing pressure to consolidate domestic banks to make them capable of facing international competition. Indian banks are pigmies compared with the global majors. India’s biggest bank, the State Bank of India, which accounts for onefifth of the total banking assets in the country, is roughly one-fifth as large as the world’s biggest bank Citigroup. Given this difference, even after consolidation of 10 omestic banks, the threat of foreign takeover remains if FDI policy with respect to the banking sector is relaxed. Not surprisingly, a number of foreign banks have already evinced an interest in acquiring a stake in Indian banks. Thus, it appears that foreign bank presence and consoli dation of banking are inevitable post Basel II. V. Conclusion A. SWOT Analysis of Basel II in Indian Banking Context Strenghts †¢ †¢ Aggression towards development of the existing standards by banks. Strong regulatory impact by central bank to all the banks for implementation. Presence of intellectual capital to face the change in implementation with good quality. †¢ †¢ †¢ Weaknesses Poor Technology Infrastructure Ineffective Risk Measures Presence of more number of Smaller banks that would likely to be impacted adversely. †¢ Opportunities †¢ †¢ Increasing Risk Management Expertise. Need significant connection among business,credit and risk management and Information Technology. Advancement of Technologies. Strong Asset Base would help in bigger growth. †¢ †¢ Threats Inability to meet the additional Capital Requirements Loss of Capital to the entire banking system, due to Mergers and acquisitions. Huge Investments in technologies †¢ †¢ †¢ B. Challenges going ahead under Basel II †¢ The new norms will almost invariably increase capital requirement in all banks across the board. Although capital requirement for credit risk may go down due to adoption of more risk sensitive models – such advantage will be more than offset by additional capital charge for operational risk and increased capital requirement for market risk. This partly explains the current trend of consolidation in the banking industry. Competition among banks for highly rated corporates needing lower amount of capital may exert pressure on already thinning interest spread. Further, huge implementation cost may also impact profitability for smaller banks. The biggest challenge is the re-structuring of the assets of some of the banks as it would be a tedious process, since most of the banks have poor asset quality leading to significant proportion of NPA. This also may lead to Mergers Acquisitions, which itself would be loss of capital to entire system. The new norms seem to favor the large banks that have better risk management and measurement expertise, who also have better capital adequacy ratios and geographically diversified portfolios. The smaller banks are also likely to be hurt by the rise in weightage †¢ †¢ †¢ 11 of inter-bank loans that will effectively price them out of the market. Thus, banks will have to re-structure and adopt if they are to survive in the new environment. †¢ Since improved risk management and measurement is needed, it aims to give impetus to the use of internal rating system by the international banks. More and more banks may have to use internal model developed in house and their impact is uncertain. Most of these models require minimum historical bank data that is a tedious and high cost process, as most Indian banks do not have such a database. The technology infrastructure in terms of computerization is still in a nascent stage in most Indian banks. Computerization of branches, especially for those banks, which have their network spread out in remote areas, will be a daunting task. Penetration of information technology in banking has been successful in the urban areas, unlike in the rural areas where it is insignificant. An integrated risk management concept, which is the need of the hour to align market, credit and operational risk, will be difficult due to significant disconnect between business, risk managers and IT across the organizations in their existing set-up. Implementation of the Basel II will require huge investments in technology. According to estimates, Indian banks, especially those with a sizeable branch network, will need to spend well over $ 50-70 Million on this. Computation of probability of default, loss given default, migration mapping and supervisory validation require creation of historical database, which is a time consuming process and may require initial support from the supervisor. With the implementation of the new framework, internal auditors may become increasingly involved in various processes, including validation and of the accuracy of the data inputs, review of activities performed by credit functions and assessment of a bank’s capital assessment process. Pillar 3 purports to enforce market discipline through stricter disclosure requirement. While admitting that such disclosure may be useful for supervisory authorities and rating agencies, the expertise and ability of the general public to comprehend and interpret disclosed information is open to question. Moreover, too much disclosure may cause information overload and may even damage financial position of bank. Basel II proposals underscore the interaction between sound risk management practices and corporate good governance. The bank’s board of directors has the responsibility for setting the basic tolerance levels for various types of risk. It should also ensure that management establishes a framework for assessing the risks, develop a system to relate risk to the bank’s capital levels and establish a method for monitoring compliance with internal policies. The risk weighting scheme under Standardised Approach also creates some incentive for some of the bank clients to remain unrated since such entities receive a lower risk weight of 100 per cent vis-a-vis 150 per cent risk weight for a lowest rated client. This might specially be the case if the unrated client expects a poor rating. The banks will need to be watchful in this regard. †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ We can conclude by saying that the Basel II framework provides significant incentives to banks to sharpen their risk management expertise to enable more efficient risk-return tradeoffs, it also presents a valuable opportunity to gear up their internal processes to the 12 international best standards. This would require substantial capacity building and commitment of resources through close involvement of the banks’ Top Management in guiding this arduous undertaking. Notwithstanding intense competition, the expansionary phase of the economy is expected to provide ample opportunities for the growth of the banking industry. The growth trajectory, adherence to global best practices and risk management norms are likely to catapult the Indian Banks onto the global map, making them a force to reckon with. VI. References 1. The Evolution to Basel II by Donald Inscoe, Deputy Director, Division of Insurance and Research, US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 2. Basel II – Challenges Ahead of the Indian Banking Industry by Jagannath Mishra and Pankaj Kumar Kalawatia. 3. Basel II Norms and Credit Ratings by CA Sangeet Kumar Gupta. 4. The Business Line Magazine. 5. The Chartered Accountant – Journal of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. 6. www. bis. org 7. www. rbi. org. in 8. www. wikipedia. org 9. www. google. com VII. The Technical Paper Presentation Team Name of Member Email ID’s rahulscsharma@icai. org tulsyan. abhishek@yahoo. co. in sikha. kedia0311@gmail. com ca. gouravmodi@gmail. com Praveen_did@yahoo. com 1. Rahul Sharma 2. Abhishek Tulsyan 3. Sikha Kedia 4. Gourav Modi 5. Praveen Didwania 13 Basel Norms in India Basel Norms in India Basel Norms in India B. C. D. E. F. G. Background Functions of Basel Committee The Evolution to Basel II – First Basel Accord Capital Requirements and Capital Calculation under Basel I Criticisms of Basel I New Approach to Risk Based Capital Structure of Basel II First Pillar : Minimum Capital Requirement Types of Risks under Pillar I The Second Pillar : Supervisory Review Process The Third Pillar : Market Discipline 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 II. The Three Pillar Approach A. B. C. D. 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 III. Capital Arbitrage and Core Effect of Basel II A. Capital Arbitrage B. Bank Loan Rating under Basel II Capital Adequacy Framework C. Effect of Basel II on Bank Loan Rating IV. Basel II in India A. Implementation C. Impact on Indian Banks D. Impact on Various Elements of Investment Portfolio of Banks E. Impact on Bad Debts and NPA’s of Indian Banks D. Government Policy on Foreign Investment E. Threat of Foreign Takeover 8 8 9 10 10 10 V. Conclusion A. SWOT Analysis of Basel II in Indian Banking Context B. Challenges going ahead under Basel II 11 11 13 13 VI. VII. References The Technical Paper Presentation Team 2 I. Introduction: A. Background Basel II is a new capital adequacy framework applicable to Scheduled Commercial Banks in India as mandated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The Basel II guidelines were issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that was initially published in June 2004. The Accord has been accepted by over 100 countries including India. In April 2007, RBI published the final guidelines for Banks operating in India. Basel II aims to create international standards that deals with Capital Measurement and Capital Standards for Banks which banking regulators can use when creating regulations about how much banks need to put aside to guard against the types of financial and operational risks banks face. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision was constituted by the Central Bank Governors of the G-10 countries in 1974 consisting of members from Australia, Brazil, Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Spain, India, Japan, etc to name a few. The ommittee regularly meets four times a year at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland where its 10 member Secretariat is located. B. Functions of the Basel Committee The purpose of the committee is to encourage the convergence toward common approaches and standards. However, the Basel Committee is not a classical multilateral organisation like World Trade Organisation. It has no founding treaty and it does not issue binding regulat ions. It is rather an informal forum to find policy solutions and promulgate standards. C. The Evolution to Basel II – First Basel Accord The First Basel Accord (Basel I) was completed in 1988. The main features of Basel I were: †¢ †¢ †¢ Set minimum capital standards for banks Standards focused on credit risk, the main risk incurred by banks Became effective end-year 1992 The First Basel Accord aimed at creating a level playing field for internationally active banks. Hence, banks from different countries competing for the same loans would have to set aside roughly the same amount of capital on the loans. D. Capital Requirements and Capital Calculation under Basel – I Minimum Capital Adequacy ratio was set at 8% and was adjusted by a loan’s credit risk weight. Credit risk was divided into 5 categories viz. 0%, 10%, 20%, 50% and 100%. Commercial loans, for example, were assigned to the 100% risk weight category. To calculate required capital, a bank would multiply the assets in each risk category by the category’s risk weight and then multiply the result by 8%. Thus, a Rs 100 commercial loan would be multiplied by 100% and then by 8%, resulting in a capital requirement of Rs8. E. Criticisms of Basel – I Following are the criticisms of the First Basel Accord (Basel I):†¢ †¢ It took too simplistic an approach to setting credit risk weights and for ignoring other types of risk. Risks weights were based on what the parties to the Accord negotiated rather than on the actual risk of each asset. Risk weights did not flow from any particular insolvency probability standard, and were for the most part, arbitrary. 3 †¢ †¢ †¢ The requirements did not account for the operational and other forms of risk that may also be important. Except for trading account activities, the capital standards did not account for hedging, diversification, and differences in risk management techniques. Advances in technology and finance allowed banks to develop their own capital allocation models in the 1990’s. This resulted in more accurate calculation of bank capital than possible under Basel I. These models allowed banks to align the amount of risk they undertook on a loan with the overall goals of the bank. Internal models allow banks to more finely differentiate risks of individual loans than is possible under Basel – I. It facilitates risks to be differentiated within loan categories and between loan categories and also allows the application of a capital charge to each loan, rather than each category of loan. F. New Approach to Risk-Based Capital †¢ †¢ †¢ By the late 1990’s, growth in the use of regulatory capital arbitrage led the Basel Committee to begin work on a new capital regime (Basel II) Effort focused on using banks’ internal rating models and internal risk models June 1999: The Basel Committee issued a proposal for a new capital adequacy framework to replace Basel – I. In order to overcome the criticisms of Basel – I and for adoption of the new approach to riskbased capital, Basel II guidelines were introduced. G. Structure of Basel – II Basel – II adopts a three pillar approach: †¢ †¢ †¢ Pillar I – Minimum Capital Requirement (Addressing Credit Risk, Operational Risk Market Risk) Pillar II – Supervisory Review (Provides Framework for Systematic Risk, Liquidity Risk Legal Risk) Pillar III – Market Discipline Disclosure (To promote greater stability in the financial system) II. The Three Pillar Approach The first pillar establishes a way to quantify the minimum capital requirements. The main objective of Pillar I is to align capital the adequacy ratios to the risk sensitivity of the assets affording a greater flexibility in the computation of banks’ individual risk. Capital Adequacy Ratio is defined as the amount of regulatory capital to be maintained by a bank to account for various risks inbuilt in the banking system. The focus of Capital Adequacy Ratio under Basel I norms was on credit risk and was calculated as follows: Capital Adequacy Ratio = Tier I Capital+Tier II Capital Risk Weighted Assets Basel Committee has revised the guidelines in the year June 2001 known as Basel II Norms. Capital Adequacy Ratio in New Accord of Basel II: Capital Adequacy Ratio = Total Capital (Tier I Capital+Tier II Capital) Market Risk(RWA) + Credit Risk(RWA) + Operation Risk(RWA) *RWA = Risk Weighted Assets Calculation of Capital Adequacy Ratio: Total Capital: Total Capital constitutes of Tier I Capital and Tier II Capital less shareholding in other banks. Tier I Capital = Ordinary Capital + Retained Earnings Share Premium – Intangible assets. Tier II Capital = Undisclosed Reserves + General Bad Debt Provision+ Revaluation Reserve+ Subordinate debt+ Redeemable Preference shares Tier III Capital: Tier III Capital includes subordinate debt with a maturity of at least 2 years. This is addition or substitution to the Tier II Capital to cover market risk alone. Tier III Capital should not cover more than 250% of Tier I capital allocated to market risk. A. First Pillar : Minimum Capital Requirement B. Types of Risks under Pillar I . Credit Risk Credit risk is the risk of loss due to a debtor’s non-payment of a loan or other line of credit (either the principal or interest (coupon) or both). Basel II envisages two different ways of measuring credit risk which are standarised approach, Internal Rating-Based Approach. The Standardised Approach The standardized approach is conceptually the same as the present Accord, but is more ri sk sensitive. Under this approach the banks are required to use ratings from External Credit Rating Agencies to quantify required capital for credit risk. The Internal Ratings Based Approach (IRB) Under the IRB approach, different methods will be provided for different types of loan exposures. Basically there are two methods for risk measurement which are Foundation IRB and Advanced IRB. The framework allows for both a foundation method in which a bank estimate the probability of default associated with each borrower, and the supervisors will 5 supply the other inputs and an advanced IRB approach, in which a bank will be permitted to supply other necessary inputs as well. Under both the foundation and advanced IRB approaches, the range of risk weights will be far more diverse than those in the standardized approach, resulting in greater risk sensitivity. 2. Operational Risk An operational risk is a risk arising from execution of a company’s business functions. As such, it is a very broad concept including e. g. fraud risk, legal risk, physical or environmental risks, etc. Basel II defines operational risk as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. Although the risks apply to any organization in business, this particular risk is of particular relevance to the banking regime where regulators are responsible for establishing safeguards to protect against systematic failure of the banking system and the economy. Banks will be able to choose between three ways of calculating the capital charge for operational risk – the Basic Indicator Approach, the Standardized Approach and the advanced measurement Approaches. 3. Market Risk Market risk is the risk that the value of a portfolio, either an nvestment portfolio or a trading portfolio, will decrease due to the change in value of the market risk factors. The four standard market risk factors are stock prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and commodity prices. The preferred approach is VAR(value at risk). C. The Second Pillar : Supervisory Review Process Supervisory review process has been introduced to ensure not only that banks have adequate capital to support all th e risks, but also to encourage them to develop and use better risk management techniques in monitoring and managing their risks. The process has four key principles – a) Banks should have a process for assessing their overall capital adequacy in relation to their risk profile and a strategy for monitoring their capital levels. b) Supervisors should review and evaluate bank’s internal capital adequacy assessment and strategies, as well as their ability to monitor and ensure their compliance with regulatory capital ratios. c) Supervisors should expect banks to operate above the minimum regulatory capital ratios and should have the ability to require banks to hold capital in excess of the minimum. ) Supervisors should seek to intervene at an early stage to prevent capital from falling below minimum level and should require rapid remedial action if capital is not mentioned or restored. D. The Third Pillar : Market Discipline Market discipline imposes strong incentives to banks to conduct their business in a safe, sound and effective manner. It is proposed to be effected through a series of disclosure requirements on capital, risk exposure etc. so that market participants can assess a bank’s capital adequacy. These disclosures should be made at least semiannually and more frequently if appropriate. Qualitative disclosures such as risk management objectives and policies, definitions etc. may be published annually. 6 III. Capital Arbitrage and Core Effect of Basel II Regulatory arbitrage is where a regulated institution takes advantage of the difference between its real (or economic) risk and the regulatory position. Securitization is the main means used by Banks to engage in Regulatory Capital Arbitrage. Example of Capital Arbitrage is given below: A. Capital Arbitrage †¢ Assume a bank has a portfolio of commercial loans with the following ratings and internally generated capital requirements – AA-A: 3%-4% capital needed – B+-B: 8% capital needed – B- and below: 12%-16% capital needed Under Basel I, the bank has to hold 8% risk-based capital against all of these loans To ensure the profitability of the better quality loans, the bank engages in capital arbitrage, it securitizes the loans so that they are reclassified into a lower regulatory risk category with a lower capital charge Lower quality loans with higher internal capital charges are kept on the bank’s books because they require less risk-based capital than the bank’s internal model indicates. †¢ †¢ †¢ B. Bank Loan Rating under Basel – II Capital Adequacy Framework †¢ On April 27, 2007, the Reserve Bank of India released the final guidelines for implementation of the New Capital Adequacy Framework (Basel II) applicable to the Banking system of the country The new framework mandates that the amount of capital provided by a bank against any loan and facility will be based on the credit rating assigned to the loan issue by an external rating agency. This means that a loan and a facility with a higher credit rating will attract a lower risk weight than one with a lower credit rating. †¢ †¢ Illustration of capital-saving potential by banks on a loan of Rs 1000 million Rating Basel I Basel II Capital Saved (Rs Long Short Risk Capital Risk Capital Million) Term Term Weight Required* Weight Required Rating Rating (Rs Million) (Rs Million) AAA P1+ 100% 90 20% 18 72 AA P1 100% 90 30% 27 63 A P2 100% 90 50% 45 45 BBB P3 100% 90 100% 90 0 BB P4 P5 100% 90 150% 135 (45) below Unrated Unrated 100% 90 100% 90 0 *Capital required is computed as Loan Amount ? Risk Weight ? 9% C. Effect of Basel – II on Bank Loan Rating †¢ †¢ Banks would either prefer that the Borrower should get itself rated, or, It would prefer that the borrowing institution should pay a higher rate of interest to compensate for the loss. 7 To substantiate the above fact, following example is taken in respect of a strong company: Loan of Rating AAA is taken of Rs 100 Crores @ 12% interest rate Capital Adequacy Rating Risk % Capital Required Opportunity Ratio (Rs Crores) Interest lost by the Bank (Rs Crores) C. A. R. Unrated 100% 9. 00 1. 08 C. A. R. New 20% 1. 80 0. 22 Total Opportunity Interest lost by the Bank (Rs Crores) 0. 86 Hence, Banks would resort to the above-mentioned measures in order to reduce or curb this loss on opportunity interest. Worse affected by this action taken by Banks would be the weaker companies. They would either be charged a higher rate of interest on loans to compensate for the loss or would alternatively have to approach another bank charging a lower rate of interest. The ideal solution to this problem would be that a weaker company should get itself rated and also take steps in order to have a better credit rating. Credit Rating is an evaluation of credit worthiness of a person, company or instrument. Thus, it indicates their willingness to pay for the obligation and the net worth. IV. Basel II in India A. Implementation The deadline for implementing the base approach of Basel II norms in India, was originally set for March 31, 2007. Later the RBI extended the deadline for Foreign banks in India and Indian banks operating abroad to meet those norms by March 31, 2008, while all other scheduled commercial banks were to adhere to the guidelines by March 31, 2009. Later the RBI confirmed that all commercial banks were Basel II compliant by March 31, 2009. Keeping in view the likely lead time that may be needed by the banks for creating the requisite technological and the risk management infrastructure, including the required databases, the MIS and the skill up-gradation, etc. , RBI has proposed the implementation of the advanced approaches under Basel II in a phased manner starting from April 1, 2010 B. Impact on Indian Banks Basel II allows national regulators to specify risk weights different from the internationally recommended ones for retail exposures. The RBI had, therefore, announced an indicative set of weights for domestic corporate long-term loans and 8 bonds subject to different ratings by international rating agencies such as Moody’s Investor Services which are slightly different from that specified by the Basel Committee (Table 1). C. Impact on various elements of the investment portfolio of banks The bonds and debentures portfolio of the banks consist of investments into higher rated companies, hence the corporate assets measured using the standardised approach may be exposed to slightly lower risk weights in comparison with the 100 per cent risk weights assigned under Basel I. The Indian banks have a large short-term portfolio in the form of cash credit, overdraft and working capital demand loans, which were un-rated, and carried a risk weight of 100 per cent under the Basel I regime. They also have short-term investments in commercial papers in their investment portfolio, which also carried a 100 per cent risk weight. The RBI’s capital adequacy guidelines has prescribed lower risk weights for short-tem exposures, if these are rated (Table 2). This provides the banks with an opportunity to benefit from their investments in commercial paper (which are typically rated in A1+/A1 category) and give them the potential to exploit the proposed short-term credit risk weights by obtaining short-term ratings for exposures in the form of cash credit, overdraft and working capital loans. The net result is that the implementation of Basel II provided Indian banks with the opportunity to significantly reduce their credit risk weights and reduce their required regulatory capital, if they suitably adjust their portfolio by lending to rated but strong corporate and increase their retail lending. According to some reports, most of the Indian banks who have migrated to Basel II have reported a reduction in their total Capital Adequacy Ratios (CARs). However, a few banks, those with high exposures to higher rated corporate or to the regulatory retail portfolio, have reported increased CARs. However, a recent study by New Delhi-based industry lobby group Assocham has concluded that Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) of a group of commercial banks, which were part of the study improved to 13. 48% in 2008-09 from 12. 35% in 2007-08, due to lower risk weights, implementation of Basel II norms and slower credit growth. 9 D. Bad debts and requirement of additional capital In this context, the situation regarding bad debts and NPA’s is very pertinent. The proportion of total NPAs to total advances declined from 23. 2 per cent in March 1993 to 7. per cent in March, 2004. The improvement in terms of NPAs has been largely the result of provisioning or infusion of capital. This meant that if the banks required more capital, as they would to implement Basel II norms, they would have to find capital outside of their own or the governmentâ₠¬â„¢s resources. ICRA has estimated that, Indian banks would need additional capital of up to Rs. 12,000 crore to meet the capital charge requirement for operational risk under Basel II. Most of this capital would be required by PSBs Rs. 9,000 crore, followed by the new generation private sector banks Rs. 1,100 crore, and the old generation private sector bank Rs. 750 crore. In practice, to deal with this, a large number of banks have been forced to turn to the capital market to meet their additional regulatory capital requirements. ICICI Bank, for example, has raised around Rs. 3,500 crore, thus improving its Tier I capital significantly. Many of the PSBs, namely, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India, Bank of Baroda and Dena Bank, besides private sector banks such as UTI Bank have either already tapped the market or have announced plans to raise equity capital in order to boost their Tier I capital. E. Government Policy on foreign investment The need to go public and raise capital challenged the government policy aimed at restricting concentration of share ownership, maintaining public dominance and limiting foreign influence in the banking sector. One immediate fallout was that PSBs being permitted to dilute the government’s stake to 51 per cent, and the pressure to reduce this to 33 per cent increased. Secondly, the government allowed private banks to expand equity by accessing capital from foreign investors. This put pressure on the RBI to rethink its policy on the ownership structure of domestic banks. In the past the RBI has emphasised the risks of concentrated foreign ownership of banking assets in India. Subsequent to a notification issued by the Government, which had raised the FDI limit in private sector banks to 74 per cent under the automatic route, a comprehensive set of policy guidelines on ownership of private banks was issued by the RBI. These guidelines stated, among other things, that no single entity or group of related entities would be allowed to hold shares or exercise control, directly or indirectly, in any private sector bank in excess of 10 per cent of its paid-up capital. F. Threat of foreign takeover There has been growing pressure to consolidate domestic banks to make them capable of facing international competition. Indian banks are pigmies compared with the global majors. India’s biggest bank, the State Bank of India, which accounts for onefifth of the total banking assets in the country, is roughly one-fifth as large as the world’s biggest bank Citigroup. Given this difference, even after consolidation of 10 omestic banks, the threat of foreign takeover remains if FDI policy with respect to the banking sector is relaxed. Not surprisingly, a number of foreign banks have already evinced an interest in acquiring a stake in Indian banks. Thus, it appears that foreign bank presence and consoli dation of banking are inevitable post Basel II. V. Conclusion A. SWOT Analysis of Basel II in Indian Banking Context Strenghts †¢ †¢ Aggression towards development of the existing standards by banks. Strong regulatory impact by central bank to all the banks for implementation. Presence of intellectual capital to face the change in implementation with good quality. †¢ †¢ †¢ Weaknesses Poor Technology Infrastructure Ineffective Risk Measures Presence of more number of Smaller banks that would likely to be impacted adversely. †¢ Opportunities †¢ †¢ Increasing Risk Management Expertise. Need significant connection among business,credit and risk management and Information Technology. Advancement of Technologies. Strong Asset Base would help in bigger growth. †¢ †¢ Threats Inability to meet the additional Capital Requirements Loss of Capital to the entire banking system, due to Mergers and acquisitions. Huge Investments in technologies †¢ †¢ †¢ B. Challenges going ahead under Basel II †¢ The new norms will almost invariably increase capital requirement in all banks across the board. Although capital requirement for credit risk may go down due to adoption of more risk sensitive models – such advantage will be more than offset by additional capital charge for operational risk and increased capital requirement for market risk. This partly explains the current trend of consolidation in the banking industry. Competition among banks for highly rated corporates needing lower amount of capital may exert pressure on already thinning interest spread. Further, huge implementation cost may also impact profitability for smaller banks. The biggest challenge is the re-structuring of the assets of some of the banks as it would be a tedious process, since most of the banks have poor asset quality leading to significant proportion of NPA. This also may lead to Mergers Acquisitions, which itself would be loss of capital to entire system. The new norms seem to favor the large banks that have better risk management and measurement expertise, who also have better capital adequacy ratios and geographically diversified portfolios. The smaller banks are also likely to be hurt by the rise in weightage †¢ †¢ †¢ 11 of inter-bank loans that will effectively price them out of the market. Thus, banks will have to re-structure and adopt if they are to survive in the new environment. †¢ Since improved risk management and measurement is needed, it aims to give impetus to the use of internal rating system by the international banks. More and more banks may have to use internal model developed in house and their impact is uncertain. Most of these models require minimum historical bank data that is a tedious and high cost process, as most Indian banks do not have such a database. The technology infrastructure in terms of computerization is still in a nascent stage in most Indian banks. Computerization of branches, especially for those banks, which have their network spread out in remote areas, will be a daunting task. Penetration of information technology in banking has been successful in the urban areas, unlike in the rural areas where it is insignificant. An integrated risk management concept, which is the need of the hour to align market, credit and operational risk, will be difficult due to significant disconnect between business, risk managers and IT across the organizations in their existing set-up. Implementation of the Basel II will require huge investments in technology. According to estimates, Indian banks, especially those with a sizeable branch network, will need to spend well over $ 50-70 Million on this. Computation of probability of default, loss given default, migration mapping and supervisory validation require creation of historical database, which is a time consuming process and may require initial support from the supervisor. With the implementation of the new framework, internal auditors may become increasingly involved in various processes, including validation and of the accuracy of the data inputs, review of activities performed by credit functions and assessment of a bank’s capital assessment process. Pillar 3 purports to enforce market discipline through stricter disclosure requirement. While admitting that such disclosure may be useful for supervisory authorities and rating agencies, the expertise and ability of the general public to comprehend and interpret disclosed information is open to question. Moreover, too much disclosure may cause information overload and may even damage financial position of bank. Basel II proposals underscore the interaction between sound risk management practices and corporate good governance. The bank’s board of directors has the responsibility for setting the basic tolerance levels for various types of risk. It should also ensure that management establishes a framework for assessing the risks, develop a system to relate risk to the bank’s capital levels and establish a method for monitoring compliance with internal policies. The risk weighting scheme under Standardised Approach also creates some incentive for some of the bank clients to remain unrated since such entities receive a lower risk weight of 100 per cent vis-a-vis 150 per cent risk weight for a lowest rated client. This might specially be the case if the unrated client expects a poor rating. The banks will need to be watchful in this regard. †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ We can conclude by saying that the Basel II framework provides significant incentives to banks to sharpen their risk management expertise to enable more efficient risk-return tradeoffs, it also presents a valuable opportunity to gear up their internal processes to the 12 international best standards. This would require substantial capacity building and commitment of resources through close involvement of the banks’ Top Management in guiding this arduous undertaking. Notwithstanding intense competition, the expansionary phase of the economy is expected to provide ample opportunities for the growth of the banking industry. The growth trajectory, adherence to global best practices and risk management norms are likely to catapult the Indian Banks onto the global map, making them a force to reckon with. VI. References 1. The Evolution to Basel II by Donald Inscoe, Deputy Director, Division of Insurance and Research, US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 2. Basel II – Challenges Ahead of the Indian Banking Industry by Jagannath Mishra and Pankaj Kumar Kalawatia. 3. Basel II Norms and Credit Ratings by CA Sangeet Kumar Gupta. 4. The Business Line Magazine. 5. The Chartered Accountant – Journal of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. 6. www. bis. org 7. www. rbi. org. in 8. www. wikipedia. org 9. www. google. com VII. The Technical Paper Presentation Team Name of Member Email ID’s rahulscsharma@icai. org tulsyan. abhishek@yahoo. co. in sikha. kedia0311@gmail. com ca. gouravmodi@gmail. com Praveen_did@yahoo. com 1. Rahul Sharma 2. Abhishek Tulsyan 3. Sikha Kedia 4. Gourav Modi 5. Praveen Didwania 13

Barclays bank report Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Barclays bank report - Essay Example Free trade policies and international business alliances have further encouraged the process of internationalization (Howes and Tah, 2003, p.35). Large scale and medium scale companies have started to expand their market boundaries in the overseas markets. With expansion of the business activities in the world market, the importance of the financial services on the global platform has become a necessary requirement. Moreover, the developing economic condition of target consumers has multiplied the business opportunities. Madura has described that business organizations who have successfully identified the new opportunities in the global market, are â€Å"capitalizing on global economic condition† (Madura, 2006 p.83). This paper will attempt to present an evaluation of the Barclays bank, a popular UK-based multinational bank for its Indian market. The primary focus of this paper is to analyze that how good the strategies of Barclays fits with the India business environmental an d Indian banking. In order to cater these objectives, an extensive situational analysis and strategies analysis will be conducted for the Barclays in India using multiple relevant strategic models and tools. 2. Analysis of environment 2.1. PESTLE In order to identify the external environment i.e. macro-economic factors, PESTLE model is an effective tool. It analyses six major factors relating to macro economic factors i.e. political, economic, socio-culture, technological, legal and environmental (Capon, 2009, p.40). For catering the stated objectives it is necessary to understand the macro-environment conditions of Indian market which has been explained below. The stable and favorable political system of Indian economy is one of the most important factors which attract many MNCs for making FDIs in this country. The government took very necessary initiatives to bring necessary reforms in its banking sectors. After the allowing the privatizing the banks, the number of private banks b etween 1969 and 1980 grow rapidly (Banerjee, Cole and Duflo, 2006). Such initiatives have caused to increase the competition by maturing the banking sectors. The appreciating economic condition of Indian economy is another major factor for better opportunities and competitions. Some of the major economic indicators of Indian economy are given below. Table 1: Key Economic Indicators (Source: CIA, 2011) As per the above figure, the Indian economy is rising at higher rate in spite of the global down turn of 2008. India has become a favorite market for many players and hence, many international banks like HSBC, RBS, and Bank of America etc have already entered. Moreover, McKinsey&Company ha reported that Indians’ disposable income is expected to rise by 25% from 22% by 2025 which will enhance the overall saving indicating better opportunities for the banks in India (Narayanswamy and Zainulbhai, 2007). Social structure of the India is also reshaping as consumers awareness among In dian is raising. India’s 1.17 billion populations is said to have higher availability of customers and clients (U.S. Department of State, 2010). The Reserve Bank of India is the chief regulatory body responsible for regulating the banking sectors. The use of information technology in Indian banking sectors have been raised significantly and the Banks in India is constantly increasing their

All forms of government welfare should be abolished Essay - 1

All forms of government welfare should be abolished - Essay Example Moreover, most of government welfare initiatives fail the test of providing long-term solutions to economic challenges facing society, thus encourage a persistent culture of reliance on others and loss of productivity. 3. What is your position regarding the topic? My position is that government welfare programs should be abolished. 4. What â€Å"evidence† have you offered to support your claim/position? Have you included your survey results? A lot of Americans were dissatisfied with the management of the program, claiming that the beneficiaries of the programs were misusing the welfare funds by staying idle, and having bigger families in order to receive more aid (Sheely, 2012). Others refrained from marriage so as to be eligible for more benefits (Greenberg, Ashworth, Cebulla, & Walker, 2005). These are clear signs of abuse, which basically call for the abolition of the government welfare. 5. Put your claim/position and â€Å"evidence† through the â€Å"Scientific Met hod† and â€Å"Proving a theory† steps. Are there any steps on which your claim/position and evidence do not measure up to the examination? If so, what can you do to make them more acceptable? Firstly, despite the significance of the welfare reform initiated in the mid-1990s, states are still struggling to curb the exploitative nature of the policy upon the productive segment of the economy. Greenberg et al (2005) indicated that more than half of people covered in the programs do not deserve the benefits. The current legal safeguards do not seem to offer long-lasting solutions to these ills at all. Many women have persisted with their habit of having many children in order to enjoy more benefits from the program. Moreover, the hefty annual benefits amounting to $7,000 is costly, especially where the beneficiaries channel the money elsewhere other than for a child’s upkeep (Grogger, Haider, & Klerman, 2003). This means that if such benefits were eliminated, chance s of women having children for purposes of benefitting from the cash would be very slim (Sheely, 2012). Secondly, as Gelman (2008) has pointed out, government revenue mainly generated from taxation of the salaries of the working class end up funding the more than a $746 billion welfare budget in 2010 (Guzman, Pirog, & Seefeldt, 2013). It is apparent that the social security fund is an area where hardworking citizens are disenfranchised to offset the needs of the supposed persons in need of services. The moneys collected from the social security fund do not amount to credible benefits for retirees. The funds are channeled to undeserving individuals who do not work hard to earn a living at all. In view of this, it is unfair for government to sustain the welfare programs because most of the beneficiaries are not willing to work hard, despite the existence of economic opportunities in the country (Grogger, Haider, & Klerman, 2003). The channeling of funds into wrong hands calls for the need to reexamine the clear definition of a needy individual. 6. Who is your intended audience? My intended audience is the government, especially the lawmakers and the working class populations because they hold the key to the abolishment of the legal structure which support welfare programs. 7. What is your purpose? What do you want the audience to do, to feel, or to think? Congress and the working class should be cognizant of the waste and work towards the realization of a change of laws as a way of making the economically

OLS final exam Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

OLS final exam - Term Paper Example In addition, these labor management relations of today are quite different from the ones used 50 years ago. Besides, there are also some important legislative issues and laws that govern these labor relations in the U.S (Lewin, Keefe & Kochan, 2012). Therefore, this paper will discuss and analyze some of the labor relations in the U.S in contemporary society as compared to those that were administered in 50 years ago (Kuang & Moser, 2011). Again, the paper will address some of the legislative issues and laws that govern labor relations in the U.S. Furthermore, the paper will discuss the causes of declining union membership in U.S and the reasons that have led to decline in union membership (Flanagan, 2005). Lastly, the paper will address contract negotiation process and give important facts about contract negotiation process (Summary of the Major Laws of the Department of Labor, 2012). Labor Relations To begin with, a comparison research about the current labor relations and the past labor relation show that, current labor relations are more organized and more beneficial to most people in the U.S. This is because today there are many provisions in the law and legislative structure on issues dealing with labor relations such as Wages and Hours labor management laws that provide standard limits for wages given to the employees and the set of standard limits of hours that an employee should work. In the past 50 years, these laws were not there; hence, the current labor relations are far much better than they used to be 50 years ago. In addition, there are labor relations laws such as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act that provides and advocates for retirement benefits to employees such as health care provisions. Besides, today, there are various procedures, policies, and provisions in the laws, that energize labor management in the country. Therefore, it is clear that labor management and relations are far much better today than 50 years ago (Max, 2013). Legislative issues and laws in United States Various legislative issues and laws in the U.S govern labor relation, and are applicable to all workers, employees, businesses, and even contractors. First, one important law is about wages and hours that outline the standard limits for wages and hours of working, which apply to both private and public employment relations. This law requires that employers should cover employees’ pay for those who work overtime and normal hours, and for overtime work, the payment should be one and a half of the normal regular rates of payment. Again, the law states that in the non-agricultural jobs, children under the age of 16 can only work on the less dangerous jobs while children can only work or are employed during school holidays, as the law does not allow school-going children under the age of 16 to be employed when they are supposed to be in school. In addition, the law provides standard conditions and procedures under which immigrants in t he U.S can work, and states that they can only work under some immigrant and nonimmigrant visa policies and programs (Summary of the Major Laws of the Department of Labor, 2012). Secondly, the Occupational Safety and Health Act provides work place and health regulations in the workplace by stating that employees in both private and

Documentations strategy document Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Documentations strategy document - Essay Example It is without doubt that paper documents are simple to understand, move, and make use of. Also the use of a lot of documents on paper can considerably decrease efficiency and boost overheads in several ways. The Hurricanes Rita and Katrina radically demonstrated the perils for businesses that uphold records totally on the paper. Loads of businesses, together with dentist’s office, lawyer offices, colleges and schools, lost almost all their paper accounts. Comparable losses can take place during the event of thunderstorms, fires and blasts plus further natural calamities. Let’s suppose if a business would keep as backup paper copies of each document inside a different location, still, it would face the extra test of keeping a track of the exact description of the documents. For instance, the IRS calls on lots of industries to preserve paper documents for seven years and then annals or raze them. It is sometimes impossible to physically trail the age of the paper documents to fulfill these policies and their obligations. The documents are effortless to lose or misplace. These Paper documents are complex to get your hands on in a suitable manner when the client is over the phone, which implies that the Accounting department has got to suspend up, move towards the filing cabinet, recover the invoice, and then call the client back. The mislaid documents effect in longer searches. When a corporation is located in numerous locations, the admission becomes even more flexible. As an effect, the paper storeroom and recovery becomes the source of extensive manual labor and overheads, which increase as the amount of invoices amplifies. The investigation conducted by the Delphi Group (Delphi.com) denotes the extent of the test and outlay: Almost all corporations tend to use up a typical of $25,000 to fill up a classic four-drawer file cabinet; $2,000 to uphold it every year. And, over the due time line of the

Future of Tourism in Oman Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Future of Tourism in Oman - Essay Example There are many difficulties in the development of this industry, because the locals do not want to exceed the limits of a local tourism promotion and thus they are prevented from a global expansion. Tourism in Oman Oman has many different privileges. First of all, this country makes large investments in ecotourism and first class tourism and tourism in this country can be interested for both Western and Eastern tourists. Oman can assure tourists of the absence of corruption and there are many perspectives for business development in this country. Oman is opening its doors for tourists†¦ The spectators are so much attracted by the new territories and numerous sightseeing that the pleasure of exploring this country transfers the borders of traditional tourism. There is no doubt that Arab hospitality is legendary. People from those countries are full of hospitality and there is no doubt that the Westerners will be greatly impressed by a large number of attractions in this country. There are two million inhabitants in Oman and this is an independent state of the Arab world. Tourists are mainly attracted by â€Å"vast coastline, over a thousand miles long, stretching from the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf to the Yemeni border in the south† (The Seven Stars of the Gulf; Oman: Traditional Terraced Village Scubadiving off the Coast of Fujairah, 2009). Moreover, there are deep historic roots in this country. The Oman museum in Muscat is rather attractive for tourists and there is no doubt that people in this country are proud of their legendary heroes, such as Sindbad the Sailor, for example. There is an evident harmony between the ancient port of Muscat and modernization of this port nowadays. A feeling of cleanness and safety is everywhere. There are different perceptions of the northern and the southern frontiers of Oman. Thus, tourist from different countries can find the places to live and to visit with respect to their own interests (Martin, 200 5). Nevertheless, it should be noted that the most explored part of Oman, which is favorable for tourists is Salalah. Tourist agencies are attracting new tourists speculating on the following things: â€Å"waters are inviting, the sand the softest and silkiest, and the birdlife extraordinary, a visitor's guide cautions you against wandering away "while wearing a sea dress" (Beirman, 2003). Oman provides tourists with different opportunities of having rest. There is an essential technological impact exerted on Oman and the Western tourists can exert a serious negative impact on cultural, moral and social values in Oman (Richards, 1999). On the one hand, in the modern global world such issues as traditional clothes or color of hair can be different even among Omani people. In their hearts and souls these people are religious and they do not have any intention to change their religion or culture. There are many difficulties for Oman and its ability to adapt social and cultural changes with respect to the Western traditions and customs. With this respect, it can be claimed that countries around the world are interested in promotion and support of their interests. In case the residents of one country want to get acquainted with the values of people and nations from another country, there is no doubt that the former should be tolerant to another country and preserve historic uniqueness and dignity of another nation. There is a high cultural

Alexander Hamilton Essay Example for Free

Alexander Hamilton Essay I consider Napoleon, Fox, and Hamilton the three greatest men of our epoch, and if I were forced to decide between the three, I would give without hesitation the first place to Hamilton. He divined Europe. Charles Maurice de Talleyrand. So begins the biography of Alexander Hamilton on the web page from Revolution to Reconstruction.   Even   Jefferson was in awe of him as he told James Madison in 1795, Hamilton is really a colossus . . . without numbers, he is a host within himself. – quoted by De Coralis. Alexander Hamilton was born in about1757 on the Caribbean island of Nevis. He had no birth certificate so the exact date is disputed, but he always said it was in 1757. He was one of two sons born illegitimately to a French Huguenot mother by an irresponsible Scots father who was later to abandon his family. His mother died of yellow fever when he was only 13, having been imprisoned for adultery at the instigation of her husband , who then managed to successfully sue for all her meagre assets, leaving the two boys with nothing. All his life Hamilton was aware that people knew of his beginnings and discussed them behind his back. After his mother’s death he began to work as clerk to New Yorker Nicolas Cruger. In Cruger’s absence he ran the firm and so even as a teenager he came to learn and to manage the intricacies of international trade – something that was to be in his stead later. He also saw the dark side of trading – slavery, which he came to hate. Eventually he was to co-found an abolitionist society. Another mentor was clergyman Hugh Knox, who tutored him in both humanities and sciences. It was these mentors and other rich islanders who paid for him to study in New York at the then King’s College . (Now Columbia University). Their idea seems to have been that he study medicine and then return to set up practice. That was the theory, but the fact was that he never returned to the islands. He arrived in New York in 1773. In 1774 the first continental Congress met to decide what to do about what they saw as the tyrannical rule of England. Following the Boston Tea Party Hamilton travelled to Boston where he became convinced of the rights of the colonists. The newspapers were full of arguments for and against and Hamilton joined in when he wrote his first pamphlet A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress, According to   Lisa Marie de Coralis on the web page ‘From Revolution to Reconstruction’,   in 1769 Hamilton had written to a friend saying that what better way was there for a young man to change his station in life than in war. His argument was that in war it is one’s abilities rather than one’s background that counts. Considering his background it is hardly a surprising view. In the summer of 1776 the British fleet were sailing towards the city of New York and Hamilton responded quickly to a call for volunteers. He soon became captain of a group of artillerymen, even paying for their uniforms himself. He and his company fought alongside Washington and his men at Long Island and in other battles that year   His talents were recognised and he became, aged 20, aide-de-camp to General George Washington with the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. It seems with hindsight that he made the right choice, for he had earlier turned down similar positions with other military leaders. He continued to be close to Washington for most of the time and was eventually among those who composed Washington’s farewell address in 1796. Valley Forge in the winter of 1777 -78 was an important time for Hamilton. Washington had some 9,000 men forced to scavenge for supplies, because of the inability of Congress to act on their behalf. All around men were starving and Hamilton realised that the   Americans would become a laughing stock if their government was seen to be unable to support its troops. There was to be an alliance with France and Hamilton, probably using the French he had leant from his mother, became interpreter. In the summer of 1779 rumours began to circulate that Hamilton was to lead a move to overthrow congress and install Washington as a dictator. Colonel John Brooks told Hamilton of these rumors adding that he had heard someone say Mr. Hamilton could be no ways interested in the defence of this country; and therefore, was most likely to pursue such a line of conduct as his great ambition dictated. His colleagues realised that the rumours were false. Hamilton was frustrated with Congress, no more. It   did make one thing plain though, Hamilton was, and always would be viewed as an outsider – a non-American, a major reason why, despite his massive abilities he is not included in the list of American Presidents. Other reasons given are his affair and the fact that his politics and reasoning were way above the heads of most Americans. Hamilton on the other hand firmly links himself with the American cause as when he wrote to Congressman Duane in 1780 â€Å"the defects of our present system, and the changes necessary to save us from ruin.    See chapter 8 ‘From Revolution to Reconstruction. In the letter he sees America as other nations would see her, with a weak congress, unable to fulfil its commitments. Much of the letter is about his financial plans for the country – not surprising for someone who was to become its treasurer. Washington was not known as a placid man. There were several spats and then in 1781, Washington felt that Hamilton was not respecting him and the two fell out. In April of that year he resigned as aide-de camp and went to stay with his new wife in Albany. From here he began his first essays on American government. The Continentalist, In 1781 he finally had his first command and victory at Yorktown. In January of 1782 his first child was born and two months later he resigned from the military, being appointed as Receiver of Taxes for New York. At the same time he began to study law, completing a three year course in just a few months. In 1782 he also became a congressman.   He is quoted by De Coralis as writing to Lafayette:- I have been employed for the last ten months in rocking the cradle and studying the art of fleecing my neighbours. I am now a Grave Counsellor   at law, and shall soon be a grand member of Congress. The Legislature   at their last session took it into their heads to name me pretty unanimously one of their delegates. As a lawyer he acted in many cases involving anti-loyalists laws. One of his most important cases ensured that federal laws were to be treated as supreme over those of individual states. Hamilton could be quite outspoken. In June 1780 he write to John Laurens describing   his fellow Americans as having ‘the passiveness of sheep †¦they are determined not to be free†¦I f we are saved France and Spain must save us.’ Eventually of course they rose to the occasion, though France did contribute to the success by not allowing Britain to make full use of its military and naval powers. Despite his American nationality he admired   the British system of government . He said when addressing congress in June 1787 ‘I believe the British government forms the best model the world ever produced.’ Hamilton is one of the anonymous contributors to the Constitution, the final text of which was drawn up by James Madison in July of 1787, according to Cohen and Major ( page 511). First of all Hamilton asked for a revision of the articles of confederation. He called them to arms saying as quoted in volume 4 of his papers:- Let Americans disdain to be instruments of European greatness! Let the thirteen states, bound together by strict and indissoluble union, concur in erecting one great American system. He signed the constitution in September 1787 and when Washington took on the presidency he knew that Hamilton was the best man to take on the country’s finance and he became the first, and perhaps the greatest, Secretary to the Treasury in 1789. He served in this post from 1789 to 1795, during which period he succeeded in restoring the country’s financial position. Early in his period of office he produced lengthy reports for congress about what the country needed financially including a system of taxation and funding of the national debt. The report controversially included the need for a national bank, an idea that Washington for one did not at first approve of. In 1792 there was a stock market panic and from this time on Hamilton came under attack for his policies. In 1804 there was to be an election. During the run up Hamilton, then leader of the Federalist party and famous for arguing for freedom of speech, was heard , on more than one occasion, to be vilifying Aaron Burr, the Republican leader, vice-president and a long time enemy. He had already come out heavily against Burr in the press. Burr demanded satisfaction in the form of a duel, and despite the fact that his beloved son had died in a duel, Hamilton, after the interchange of several letters, finally conceded. It was his eleventh and last duel. Hamilton fired firs t and missed. Burr’s first shot, hit Hamilton in lower abdomen, paralysed him and he died at home the following day, having confessed to hi s doctor that he had had no intention of hitting Burr. He died   leaving a wife, seven children and a mountain of debts, having frequently undercharged clients, subsidised newspapers and having refused an army pension. The financial genius had failed to provide for himself. Neither man benefited as Burr was indicted for murder, though duelling was not outlawed in New Jersey, and though later acquitted, Burr’s political career was over, as of course was Hamilton’s. Bibliography Crystal, D. editor, The Cambridge Biographical Encyclopedia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995 Hamilton,A. Address to the Constitutional Congress, 11th June 1787, quoted by Cohen,M. and Major,J. in History in Quotations, Cassell, London ,2004. Hamilton, A., The Papers of Alexander Hamilton vol2 (1961) pages 347-8, volume 4,   page 345. Electronic Sources De Coralis, L.M. From Revolution to Reconstruction, Biography of Alexander Hamilton found 2nd June 2007   http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/B/hamilton/hamilxx.htm